Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Zimbabwe: Carrots and turnips — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0654 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0627 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
60th
Zimbabwe rank
62nd

Carrots and turnips — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Zimbabwe
00.050.10.150.2198620042023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.0654 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0627 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 60th and Zimbabwe ranks 62nd of 117 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0896 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0895 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0673 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0636 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.1115 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0315 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0801 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.0788 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0238 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carrots and turnips — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Saint Kitts and Nevis or Zimbabwe?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.0654 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0627 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in carrots and turnips — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Zimbabwe?
0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Zimbabwe rank globally for carrots and turnips — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 60th and Zimbabwe ranks 62nd of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carrots and turnips — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Zimbabwe: Carrots and turnips — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/carrots-and-turnips-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/st-kitts-and-nevis/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/carrots-and-turnips-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/st-kitts-and-nevis/zimbabwe/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Zimbabwe: Carrots and turnips — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carrots and turnips — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 5,218 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Carrots and turnips — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.