Rwanda vs Tunisia: Carrots and turnips — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Rwanda
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Tunisia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Rwanda rank
5th
Tunisia rank
6th
Carrots and turnips — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Rwanda
- Tunisia
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Tunisia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.5 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tunisia ahead.
Rwanda ranks 5th and Tunisia ranks 6th of 117 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carrots and turnips — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Rwanda or Tunisia?
- Rwanda, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in carrots and turnips — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Rwanda and Tunisia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tunisia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Tunisia rank globally for carrots and turnips — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Rwanda ranks 5th and Tunisia ranks 6th of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Carrots and turnips — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Carrots and turnips — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.