Bhutan vs Tunisia: Carrots and turnips — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Bhutan
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Tunisia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Bhutan rank
9th
Tunisia rank
6th
Carrots and turnips — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Bhutan
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Bhutan, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.3 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Tunisia ahead.
Bhutan ranks 9th and Tunisia ranks 6th of 117 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carrots and turnips — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Bhutan or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Bhutan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in carrots and turnips — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Bhutan and Tunisia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Tunisia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Tunisia rank globally for carrots and turnips — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Bhutan ranks 9th and Tunisia ranks 6th of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Carrots and turnips — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Carrots and turnips — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.