Bangladesh vs Costa Rica: Carrots and turnips — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Bangladesh
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Costa Rica
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
64th
Costa Rica rank
65th
Carrots and turnips — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Bangladesh
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 64th and Costa Rica ranks 65th of 117 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carrots and turnips — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Bangladesh or Costa Rica?
- Bangladesh, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in carrots and turnips — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Bangladesh and Costa Rica?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Costa Rica?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Costa Rica rank globally for carrots and turnips — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Bangladesh ranks 64th and Costa Rica ranks 65th of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Carrots and turnips — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Carrots and turnips — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.