Curacao vs Japan: Capture fishery production, per unit of GDP
Curacao
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Japan
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Curacao rank
113th
Japan rank
115th
Capture fishery production, per unit of GDP over time
- Curacao
- Japan
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Japan, a difference of 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Curacao has been ahead every year.
Curacao ranks 113th and Japan ranks 115th of 210 countries.
Curacao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | Curacao |
| 2020s | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | Curacao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher capture fishery production, per unit of gdp, Curacao or Japan?
- Curacao, at 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in capture fishery production, per unit of gdp between Curacao and Japan?
- 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Japan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Curacao and Japan rank globally for capture fishery production, per unit of gdp?
- Curacao ranks 113th and Japan ranks 115th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Capture fishery production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.