Uruguay vs Zimbabwe: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre
Uruguay
0.2763 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.2712 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Uruguay rank
137th
Zimbabwe rank
138th
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre over time
- Uruguay
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0.2763 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2712 metric tons per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0051 metric tons per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.
Uruguay ranks 137th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 215 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uruguay | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1276 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0045 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.123 metric tons per square kilometre | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 0.2953 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0114 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.2839 metric tons per square kilometre | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 0.781 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0543 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.7267 metric tons per square kilometre | Uruguay |
| 1990s | 0.7114 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.157 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.5543 metric tons per square kilometre | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.6431 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.2181 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.4249 metric tons per square kilometre | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0.388 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.3224 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0656 metric tons per square kilometre | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.3584 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.265 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0933 metric tons per square kilometre | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher capture fishery production, per square kilometre, Uruguay or Zimbabwe?
- Uruguay, at 0.2763 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2712 metric tons per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in capture fishery production, per square kilometre between Uruguay and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0051 metric tons per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uruguay and Zimbabwe?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Uruguay and Zimbabwe rank globally for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
- Uruguay ranks 137th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.