Sao Tome and Principe vs Sri Lanka: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre

Sao Tome and Principe
5.97 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Sri Lanka
5.75 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe rank
30th
Sri Lanka rank
31st

Capture fishery production, per square kilometre over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Sri Lanka
02.557.51012.5196119922024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 5.97 metric tons per square kilometre against 5.75 metric tons per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.22 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th and Sri Lanka ranks 31st of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0.787 metric tons per square kilometre 1.29 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4994 metric tons per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 0.9196 metric tons per square kilometre 1.84 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9157 metric tons per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 3.31 metric tons per square kilometre 3.12 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1854 metric tons per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 3.7 metric tons per square kilometre 3.88 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1776 metric tons per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 4.33 metric tons per square kilometre 4.71 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3714 metric tons per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 8.55 metric tons per square kilometre 7.37 metric tons per square kilometre 1.18 metric tons per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 5.81 metric tons per square kilometre 5.76 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0504 metric tons per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fishery production, per square kilometre, Sao Tome and Principe or Sri Lanka?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 5.97 metric tons per square kilometre against 5.75 metric tons per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fishery production, per square kilometre between Sao Tome and Principe and Sri Lanka?
0.22 metric tons per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Sri Lanka?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Sri Lanka rank globally for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th and Sri Lanka ranks 31st of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Sri Lanka: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/sri-lanka/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Sri Lanka: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,459 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.