Portugal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre

Portugal
2.59 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
2.59 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Portugal rank
59th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
60th

Capture fishery production, per square kilometre over time

  • Portugal
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0100200300400196119922024

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 2.59 metric tons per square kilometre against 2.59 metric tons per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.

Portugal ranks 59th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 60th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 3 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 5.94 metric tons per square kilometre 2.06 metric tons per square kilometre 3.88 metric tons per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 4.25 metric tons per square kilometre 3.76 metric tons per square kilometre 0.491 metric tons per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 3.44 metric tons per square kilometre 4.76 metric tons per square kilometre 1.32 metric tons per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 2.99 metric tons per square kilometre 2.05 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9397 metric tons per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 2.36 metric tons per square kilometre 4.74 metric tons per square kilometre 2.38 metric tons per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 2.12 metric tons per square kilometre 158.23 metric tons per square kilometre 156.11 metric tons per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 1.97 metric tons per square kilometre 2.56 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5993 metric tons per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fishery production, per square kilometre, Portugal or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Portugal, at 2.59 metric tons per square kilometre against 2.59 metric tons per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fishery production, per square kilometre between Portugal and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0 metric tons per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Portugal and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
Portugal ranks 59th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 60th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/portugal/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/portugal/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Portugal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,459 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.