Honduras vs New Caledonia: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre

Honduras
0.1931 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
New Caledonia
0.2173 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Honduras rank
149th
New Caledonia rank
147th

Capture fishery production, per square kilometre over time

  • Honduras
  • New Caledonia
00.10.20.3196119922024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.2173 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1931 metric tons per square kilometre in Honduras, a difference of 0.0242 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Honduras ahead.

Honduras ranks 149th and New Caledonia ranks 147th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0326 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0413 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0087 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 0.05 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0747 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0248 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 0.1349 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1973 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0623 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0.2185 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1871 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0314 metric tons per square kilometre Honduras
2000s 0.162 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1977 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0356 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.1055 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2142 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1087 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.1789 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1981 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0192 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fishery production, per square kilometre, Honduras or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0.2173 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1931 metric tons per square kilometre in Honduras as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fishery production, per square kilometre between Honduras and New Caledonia?
0.0242 metric tons per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and New Caledonia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Honduras and New Caledonia rank globally for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
Honduras ranks 149th and New Caledonia ranks 147th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs New Caledonia: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/honduras/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/honduras/new-caledonia/">Honduras vs New Caledonia: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,459 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.