Gibraltar vs Trinidad and Tobago: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre

Gibraltar
2.55 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
2.52 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Gibraltar rank
61st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
62nd

Capture fishery production, per square kilometre over time

  • Gibraltar
  • Trinidad and Tobago
01234196119922024

How they compare

Gibraltar currently reports 2.55 metric tons per square kilometre against 2.52 metric tons per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.03 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Gibraltar ranks 61st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 62nd of 215 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gibraltar Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5545 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4545 metric tons per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.1 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7978 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6978 metric tons per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.1 metric tons per square kilometre 1.16 metric tons per square kilometre 1.06 metric tons per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.1 metric tons per square kilometre 2.37 metric tons per square kilometre 2.27 metric tons per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.1 metric tons per square kilometre 2.93 metric tons per square kilometre 2.83 metric tons per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.8473 metric tons per square kilometre 2.53 metric tons per square kilometre 1.68 metric tons per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 2.48 metric tons per square kilometre 2.54 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0638 metric tons per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fishery production, per square kilometre, Gibraltar or Trinidad and Tobago?
Gibraltar, at 2.55 metric tons per square kilometre against 2.52 metric tons per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fishery production, per square kilometre between Gibraltar and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.03 metric tons per square kilometre, with Gibraltar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Trinidad and Tobago?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Gibraltar and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
Gibraltar ranks 61st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 62nd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gibraltar vs Trinidad and Tobago: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/gibraltar/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/gibraltar/trinidad-and-tobago/">Gibraltar vs Trinidad and Tobago: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,459 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.