Faroe Islands vs Maldives: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre

Faroe Islands
494.67 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Maldives
360.45 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Faroe Islands rank
4th
Maldives rank
5th

Capture fishery production, per square kilometre over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Maldives
0200400600196119922024

How they compare

Faroe Islands currently reports 494.67 metric tons per square kilometre against 360.45 metric tons per square kilometre in Maldives, a difference of 134.22 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Faroe Islands's figure about 1.4 times Maldives's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 4th and Maldives ranks 5th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 3 and Maldives in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Maldives Difference Ahead
1960s 110.15 metric tons per square kilometre 63.37 metric tons per square kilometre 46.78 metric tons per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1970s 189.61 metric tons per square kilometre 111.07 metric tons per square kilometre 78.54 metric tons per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1980s 232.05 metric tons per square kilometre 180.92 metric tons per square kilometre 51.13 metric tons per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1990s 206.99 metric tons per square kilometre 333.32 metric tons per square kilometre 126.32 metric tons per square kilometre Maldives
2000s 387.07 metric tons per square kilometre 497.64 metric tons per square kilometre 110.57 metric tons per square kilometre Maldives
2010s 380.85 metric tons per square kilometre 435.89 metric tons per square kilometre 55.05 metric tons per square kilometre Maldives
2020s 477.77 metric tons per square kilometre 479.11 metric tons per square kilometre 1.33 metric tons per square kilometre Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fishery production, per square kilometre, Faroe Islands or Maldives?
Faroe Islands, at 494.67 metric tons per square kilometre against 360.45 metric tons per square kilometre in Maldives as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fishery production, per square kilometre between Faroe Islands and Maldives?
134.22 metric tons per square kilometre, with Faroe Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Maldives?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Faroe Islands and Maldives rank globally for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
Faroe Islands ranks 4th and Maldives ranks 5th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Maldives: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/maldives/">Faroe Islands vs Maldives: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,459 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.