Equatorial Guinea vs Kenya: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.2586 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Kenya
0.2407 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
141st
Kenya rank
143rd

Capture fishery production, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Kenya
00.10.20.30.4196119922024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.2586 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2407 metric tons per square kilometre in Kenya, a difference of 0.0179 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kenya ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 141st and Kenya ranks 143rd of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Kenya in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Kenya Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0531 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0413 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0118 metric tons per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.1426 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0631 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0795 metric tons per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.1189 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1808 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0618 metric tons per square kilometre Kenya
1990s 0.1633 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3319 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1686 metric tons per square kilometre Kenya
2000s 0.154 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2706 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1166 metric tons per square kilometre Kenya
2010s 0.2403 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2797 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0394 metric tons per square kilometre Kenya
2020s 0.2377 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2433 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0056 metric tons per square kilometre Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fishery production, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Kenya?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.2586 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2407 metric tons per square kilometre in Kenya as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fishery production, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Kenya?
0.0179 metric tons per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Kenya?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Kenya rank globally for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 141st and Kenya ranks 143rd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Kenya: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/kenya/">Equatorial Guinea vs Kenya: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,459 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.