El Salvador vs Uganda: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre

El Salvador
2.76 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Uganda
2.68 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
El Salvador rank
55th
Uganda rank
56th

Capture fishery production, per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Uganda
01234196119922024

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 2.76 metric tons per square kilometre against 2.68 metric tons per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.08 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 55th and Uganda ranks 56th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4498 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4219 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0279 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 0.4751 metric tons per square kilometre 0.867 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3919 metric tons per square kilometre Uganda
1980s 0.696 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9367 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2407 metric tons per square kilometre Uganda
1990s 0.5797 metric tons per square kilometre 1.12 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5401 metric tons per square kilometre Uganda
2000s 1.85 metric tons per square kilometre 1.66 metric tons per square kilometre 0.196 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 2.62 metric tons per square kilometre 2.17 metric tons per square kilometre 0.45 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 2.82 metric tons per square kilometre 2.91 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0888 metric tons per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fishery production, per square kilometre, El Salvador or Uganda?
El Salvador, at 2.76 metric tons per square kilometre against 2.68 metric tons per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fishery production, per square kilometre between El Salvador and Uganda?
0.08 metric tons per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Uganda?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do El Salvador and Uganda rank globally for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 55th and Uganda ranks 56th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Uganda: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/uganda/">El Salvador vs Uganda: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,459 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.