El Salvador vs Georgia: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre

El Salvador
2.76 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Georgia
2.89 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
El Salvador rank
55th
Georgia rank
54th

Capture fishery production, per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Georgia
01234196119922024

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 2.89 metric tons per square kilometre against 2.76 metric tons per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.13 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 55th and Georgia ranks 54th of 215 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and Georgia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.6056 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1381 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4675 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 1.85 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2702 metric tons per square kilometre 1.58 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 2.62 metric tons per square kilometre 1.12 metric tons per square kilometre 1.5 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 2.82 metric tons per square kilometre 2.91 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0981 metric tons per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fishery production, per square kilometre, El Salvador or Georgia?
Georgia, at 2.89 metric tons per square kilometre against 2.76 metric tons per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fishery production, per square kilometre between El Salvador and Georgia?
0.13 metric tons per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Georgia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do El Salvador and Georgia rank globally for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 55th and Georgia ranks 54th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Georgia: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/georgia/">El Salvador vs Georgia: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,459 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.