Dominican Republic vs Sweden: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre

Dominican Republic
0.4117 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Sweden
0.3427 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Dominican Republic rank
127th
Sweden rank
130th

Capture fishery production, per square kilometre over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Sweden
00.20.40.60.81196119922024

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 0.4117 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.3427 metric tons per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.069 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 127th and Sweden ranks 130th of 215 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0711 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7911 metric tons per square kilometre 0.72 metric tons per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 0.1282 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5241 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3959 metric tons per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0.3126 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5932 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2806 metric tons per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.3079 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8395 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5316 metric tons per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.2925 metric tons per square kilometre 0.663 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3706 metric tons per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.2927 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4831 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1903 metric tons per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.3604 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3896 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0292 metric tons per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fishery production, per square kilometre, Dominican Republic or Sweden?
Dominican Republic, at 0.4117 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.3427 metric tons per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fishery production, per square kilometre between Dominican Republic and Sweden?
0.069 metric tons per square kilometre, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Sweden?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Dominican Republic and Sweden rank globally for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
Dominican Republic ranks 127th and Sweden ranks 130th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Sweden: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/sweden/">Dominican Republic vs Sweden: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,459 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.