Dominican Republic vs Finland: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre

Dominican Republic
0.4117 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Finland
0.3662 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Dominican Republic rank
127th
Finland rank
129th

Capture fishery production, per square kilometre over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Finland
00.20.40.6196119922024

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 0.4117 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.3662 metric tons per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0.0455 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 127th and Finland ranks 129th of 215 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0711 metric tons per square kilometre 0.245 metric tons per square kilometre 0.174 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.1282 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3537 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2255 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.3126 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5223 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2097 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0.3079 metric tons per square kilometre 0.52 metric tons per square kilometre 0.212 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0.2925 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4789 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1864 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.2927 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5697 metric tons per square kilometre 0.277 metric tons per square kilometre Finland
2020s 0.3604 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4271 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0668 metric tons per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fishery production, per square kilometre, Dominican Republic or Finland?
Dominican Republic, at 0.4117 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.3662 metric tons per square kilometre in Finland as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fishery production, per square kilometre between Dominican Republic and Finland?
0.0455 metric tons per square kilometre, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Finland?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Dominican Republic and Finland rank globally for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
Dominican Republic ranks 127th and Finland ranks 129th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Finland: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/finland/">Dominican Republic vs Finland: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,459 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.