China vs Rwanda: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre

China
1.41 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Rwanda
1.46 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
China rank
82nd
Rwanda rank
80th

Capture fishery production, per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Rwanda
00.511.52196119922024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 1.46 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.41 metric tons per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.05 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China ahead.

China ranks 82nd and Rwanda ranks 80th of 215 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2677 metric tons per square kilometre 0.027 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2406 metric tons per square kilometre China
1970s 0.3401 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0412 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2989 metric tons per square kilometre China
1980s 0.4673 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0492 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4181 metric tons per square kilometre China
1990s 1.23 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1628 metric tons per square kilometre 1.07 metric tons per square kilometre China
2000s 1.58 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3349 metric tons per square kilometre 1.24 metric tons per square kilometre China
2010s 1.65 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8948 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7562 metric tons per square kilometre China
2020s 1.41 metric tons per square kilometre 1.36 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0486 metric tons per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fishery production, per square kilometre, China or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 1.46 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.41 metric tons per square kilometre in China as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fishery production, per square kilometre between China and Rwanda?
0.05 metric tons per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Rwanda?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China and Rwanda rank globally for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
China ranks 82nd and Rwanda ranks 80th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Rwanda: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/china/rwanda/">China vs Rwanda: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,459 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.