Central African Republic vs Hungary: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre

Central African Republic
0.0466 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Hungary
0.052 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
177th
Hungary rank
176th

Capture fishery production, per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Hungary
00.050.10.150.20.25196119922024

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0.052 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0466 metric tons per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0054 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Central African Republic's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 177th and Hungary ranks 176th of 215 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Hungary Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0057 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0859 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0802 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary
1970s 0.0164 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0989 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0825 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 0.0209 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1901 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1692 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 0.0221 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0964 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0743 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 0.0385 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0783 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0397 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 0.049 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0667 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0177 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary
2020s 0.0457 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0527 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0069 metric tons per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fishery production, per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Hungary?
Hungary, at 0.052 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0466 metric tons per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fishery production, per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Hungary?
0.0054 metric tons per square kilometre, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Hungary?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Central African Republic and Hungary rank globally for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 177th and Hungary ranks 176th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Hungary: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/hungary/">Central African Republic vs Hungary: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,459 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.