Aruba vs New Zealand: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre
Aruba
0.9722 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
New Zealand
1.23 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Aruba rank
89th
New Zealand rank
86th
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre over time
- Aruba
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 1.23 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9722 metric tons per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 0.2578 metric tons per square kilometre.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 89th and New Zealand ranks 86th of 215 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.79 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.1922 metric tons per square kilometre | 1.6 metric tons per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 1970s | 3.19 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.2798 metric tons per square kilometre | 2.91 metric tons per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 1980s | 3.87 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.8126 metric tons per square kilometre | 3.06 metric tons per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 1990s | 1.36 metric tons per square kilometre | 1.89 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.5266 metric tons per square kilometre | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.8839 metric tons per square kilometre | 1.98 metric tons per square kilometre | 1.1 metric tons per square kilometre | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.8417 metric tons per square kilometre | 1.64 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.7947 metric tons per square kilometre | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.9356 metric tons per square kilometre | 1.3 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.3614 metric tons per square kilometre | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher capture fishery production, per square kilometre, Aruba or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 1.23 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9722 metric tons per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in capture fishery production, per square kilometre between Aruba and New Zealand?
- 0.2578 metric tons per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and New Zealand?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and New Zealand rank globally for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
- Aruba ranks 89th and New Zealand ranks 86th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.