Aruba vs Latvia: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre

Aruba
0.9722 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Latvia
0.9058 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Aruba rank
89th
Latvia rank
91st

Capture fishery production, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Latvia
1234196119922024

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0.9722 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9058 metric tons per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0664 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Aruba ranks 89th and Latvia ranks 91st of 215 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.17 metric tons per square kilometre 2.13 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9654 metric tons per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 0.8839 metric tons per square kilometre 2.23 metric tons per square kilometre 1.35 metric tons per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 0.8417 metric tons per square kilometre 1.7 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8596 metric tons per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0.9356 metric tons per square kilometre 1 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0651 metric tons per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fishery production, per square kilometre, Aruba or Latvia?
Aruba, at 0.9722 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9058 metric tons per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fishery production, per square kilometre between Aruba and Latvia?
0.0664 metric tons per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Latvia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Aruba and Latvia rank globally for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 89th and Latvia ranks 91st of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Latvia: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/aruba/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/aruba/latvia/">Aruba vs Latvia: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,459 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.