Aruba vs Jamaica: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre

Aruba
0.9722 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Jamaica
1.18 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Aruba rank
89th
Jamaica rank
87th

Capture fishery production, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Jamaica
1234196119922024

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 1.18 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9722 metric tons per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 0.2078 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.2 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 89th and Jamaica ranks 87th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 3 and Jamaica in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 1.79 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8967 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8934 metric tons per square kilometre Aruba
1970s 3.19 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8949 metric tons per square kilometre 2.29 metric tons per square kilometre Aruba
1980s 3.87 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8989 metric tons per square kilometre 2.97 metric tons per square kilometre Aruba
1990s 1.36 metric tons per square kilometre 1.85 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4857 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 0.8839 metric tons per square kilometre 1.27 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3821 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 0.8417 metric tons per square kilometre 1.52 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6795 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 0.9356 metric tons per square kilometre 1.18 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2452 metric tons per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fishery production, per square kilometre, Aruba or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at 1.18 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9722 metric tons per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fishery production, per square kilometre between Aruba and Jamaica?
0.2078 metric tons per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Jamaica?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Aruba and Jamaica rank globally for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 89th and Jamaica ranks 87th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Jamaica: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/aruba/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/aruba/jamaica/">Aruba vs Jamaica: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,459 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.