Antigua and Barbuda vs Norway: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
7.46 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Norway
6.39 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Antigua and Barbuda rank
24th
Norway rank
26th

Capture fishery production, per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Norway
2.557.51012.5196119922024

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 7.46 metric tons per square kilometre against 6.39 metric tons per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 1.07 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.2 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 24th and Norway ranks 26th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 1.79 metric tons per square kilometre 6.55 metric tons per square kilometre 4.76 metric tons per square kilometre Norway
1970s 3.17 metric tons per square kilometre 8.51 metric tons per square kilometre 5.34 metric tons per square kilometre Norway
1980s 3.43 metric tons per square kilometre 6.55 metric tons per square kilometre 3.13 metric tons per square kilometre Norway
1990s 3.21 metric tons per square kilometre 7.21 metric tons per square kilometre 3.99 metric tons per square kilometre Norway
2000s 5.84 metric tons per square kilometre 7.37 metric tons per square kilometre 1.53 metric tons per square kilometre Norway
2010s 7.9 metric tons per square kilometre 6.76 metric tons per square kilometre 1.14 metric tons per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 7.32 metric tons per square kilometre 6.99 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3296 metric tons per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fishery production, per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Norway?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 7.46 metric tons per square kilometre against 6.39 metric tons per square kilometre in Norway as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fishery production, per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Norway?
1.07 metric tons per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Norway?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Norway rank globally for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 24th and Norway ranks 26th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Norway: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/norway/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Norway: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,459 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.