American Samoa vs Netherlands: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre

American Samoa
7.6 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
Netherlands
8.82 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2024
American Samoa rank
22nd
Netherlands rank
20th

Capture fishery production, per square kilometre over time

  • American Samoa
  • Netherlands
0102030196119922024

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 8.82 metric tons per square kilometre against 7.6 metric tons per square kilometre in American Samoa, a difference of 1.22 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.2 times American Samoa's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Netherlands ahead.

American Samoa ranks 22nd and Netherlands ranks 20th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, American Samoa averaged higher in 2 and Netherlands in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade American Samoa Netherlands Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 7.3 metric tons per square kilometre 7.3 metric tons per square kilometre Netherlands
1970s 0.5045 metric tons per square kilometre 6.56 metric tons per square kilometre 6.06 metric tons per square kilometre Netherlands
1980s 0.6395 metric tons per square kilometre 11.88 metric tons per square kilometre 11.24 metric tons per square kilometre Netherlands
1990s 1.15 metric tons per square kilometre 13.27 metric tons per square kilometre 12.13 metric tons per square kilometre Netherlands
2000s 22.92 metric tons per square kilometre 14.55 metric tons per square kilometre 8.37 metric tons per square kilometre American Samoa
2010s 14.37 metric tons per square kilometre 11.39 metric tons per square kilometre 2.98 metric tons per square kilometre American Samoa
2020s 6.32 metric tons per square kilometre 8.73 metric tons per square kilometre 2.41 metric tons per square kilometre Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fishery production, per square kilometre, American Samoa or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 8.82 metric tons per square kilometre against 7.6 metric tons per square kilometre in American Samoa as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fishery production, per square kilometre between American Samoa and Netherlands?
1.22 metric tons per square kilometre, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Netherlands?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do American Samoa and Netherlands rank globally for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
American Samoa ranks 22nd and Netherlands ranks 20th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

American Samoa vs Netherlands: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/american-samoa/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-per-square-kilometre/american-samoa/netherlands/">American Samoa vs Netherlands: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,459 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.