Nepal vs Sudan: Capture fishery production, per capita
Nepal
0.0007 metric tons per person
in 2024
Sudan
0.0008 metric tons per person
in 2024
Nepal rank
178th
Sudan rank
175th
Capture fishery production, per capita over time
- Nepal
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0.0008 metric tons per person against 0.0007 metric tons per person in Nepal, a difference of 0.0001 metric tons per person.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Nepal's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Nepal ranks 178th and Sudan ranks 175th of 215 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0008 metric tons per person | 0.0009 metric tons per person | 0.0001 metric tons per person | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0007 metric tons per person | 0.0008 metric tons per person | 0.0001 metric tons per person | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher capture fishery production, per capita, Nepal or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0.0008 metric tons per person against 0.0007 metric tons per person in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in capture fishery production, per capita between Nepal and Sudan?
- 0.0001 metric tons per person, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and Sudan rank globally for capture fishery production, per capita?
- Nepal ranks 178th and Sudan ranks 175th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Capture fishery production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.