Iraq vs Sudan: Capture fishery production, per capita
Iraq
0.0009 metric tons per person
in 2024
Sudan
0.0008 metric tons per person
in 2024
Iraq rank
173rd
Sudan rank
175th
Capture fishery production, per capita over time
- Iraq
- Sudan
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0.0009 metric tons per person against 0.0008 metric tons per person in Sudan, a difference of 0.0001 metric tons per person.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 173rd and Sudan ranks 175th of 215 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0011 metric tons per person | 0.0009 metric tons per person | 0.0002 metric tons per person | Iraq |
| 2020s | 0.0009 metric tons per person | 0.0008 metric tons per person | 0.0001 metric tons per person | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher capture fishery production, per capita, Iraq or Sudan?
- Iraq, at 0.0009 metric tons per person against 0.0008 metric tons per person in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in capture fishery production, per capita between Iraq and Sudan?
- 0.0001 metric tons per person, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Iraq and Sudan rank globally for capture fishery production, per capita?
- Iraq ranks 173rd and Sudan ranks 175th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Capture fishery production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.