Sao Tome and Principe vs Switzerland: Capture fishery production, annual growth rate

Sao Tome and Principe
1.46 % change on previous year
in 2024
Switzerland
1.64 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe rank
86th
Switzerland rank
83rd

Capture fishery production, annual growth rate over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Switzerland
-40-200204060196119922024

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 1.64 % change on previous year against 1.46 % change on previous year in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.18 % change on previous year.

That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 29 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 86th and Switzerland ranks 83rd of 211 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 6 and Switzerland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Switzerland Difference Ahead
1960s 7.98 % change on previous year 4.32 % change on previous year 3.66 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 9.15 % change on previous year 1.84 % change on previous year 7.31 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 10.17 % change on previous year -0.7761 % change on previous year 10.95 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 2.26 % change on previous year -4.34 % change on previous year 6.6 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 2.57 % change on previous year 2.38 % change on previous year 0.192 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 3.23 % change on previous year -4.22 % change on previous year 7.44 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 1.32 % change on previous year 2.37 % change on previous year 1.05 % change on previous year Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capture fishery production, annual growth rate, Sao Tome and Principe or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 1.64 % change on previous year against 1.46 % change on previous year in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in capture fishery production, annual growth rate between Sao Tome and Principe and Switzerland?
0.18 % change on previous year, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Switzerland?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Switzerland rank globally for capture fishery production, annual growth rate?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 86th and Switzerland ranks 83rd of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capture fishery production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Switzerland: Capture fishery production, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-annual-growth-rate/sao-tome-and-principe/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fishery-production-annual-growth-rate/sao-tome-and-principe/switzerland/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Switzerland: Capture fishery production, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capture fishery production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 12,210 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Capture fishery production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.