Micronesia (country) vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture

Micronesia (country)
0.5 metric tons
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 metric tons
in 2024
Micronesia (country) rank
197th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
200th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture over time

  • Micronesia (country)
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0100200300400196019922024

How they compare

Micronesia (country) currently reports 0.5 metric tons against 0 metric tons in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.5 metric tons.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Micronesia (country) ranks 197th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 200th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Micronesia (country) averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia (country) Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons 0 metric tons 0 metric tons —
1970s 0 metric tons 0 metric tons 0 metric tons —
1980s 8.9 metric tons 47 metric tons 38.1 metric tons Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 0 metric tons 3.7 metric tons 3.7 metric tons Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0 metric tons 10.22 metric tons 10.22 metric tons Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.2 metric tons 0.45 metric tons 0.25 metric tons Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.5 metric tons 0 metric tons 0.5 metric tons Micronesia (country)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, Micronesia (country) or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Micronesia (country), at 0.5 metric tons against 0 metric tons in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture between Micronesia (country) and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.5 metric tons, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Turks and Caicos Islands?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Micronesia (country) and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture?
Micronesia (country) ranks 197th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 200th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia (country) vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-vs-aquaculture/micronesia-fed-sts/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-vs-aquaculture/micronesia-fed-sts/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Micronesia (country) vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture
Unit
metric tons
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
215 places, 12,849 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Aquaculture means raising fish and other seafood — including molluscs, crustaceans and aquatic plants — in farms. Capture fishery production is how much wild fish is caught, whether for commercial, industrial, recreational, or subsistence use.