Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture

Eswatini
25 metric tons
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau
18 metric tons
in 2024
Eswatini rank
170th
Guinea-Bissau rank
173rd

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture over time

  • Eswatini
  • Guinea-Bissau
020406080100196019922024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 25 metric tons against 18 metric tons in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 7 metric tons.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.4 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Eswatini ranks 170th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 173rd of 215 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons 0 metric tons 0 metric tons —
1970s 0 metric tons 0 metric tons 0 metric tons —
1980s 11.7 metric tons 0 metric tons 11.7 metric tons Eswatini
1990s 62.1 metric tons 0 metric tons 62.1 metric tons Eswatini
2000s 48.1 metric tons 0 metric tons 48.1 metric tons Eswatini
2010s 33 metric tons 8 metric tons 25 metric tons Eswatini
2020s 23 metric tons 15.6 metric tons 7.4 metric tons Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, Eswatini or Guinea-Bissau?
Eswatini, at 25 metric tons against 18 metric tons in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture between Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
7 metric tons, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
57 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture?
Eswatini ranks 170th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 173rd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-vs-aquaculture/eswatini/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/capture-fisheries-vs-aquaculture/eswatini/guinea-bissau/">Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture
Unit
metric tons
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
215 places, 12,849 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Aquaculture means raising fish and other seafood — including molluscs, crustaceans and aquatic plants — in farms. Capture fishery production is how much wild fish is caught, whether for commercial, industrial, recreational, or subsistence use.