Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Yugoslav SFR: Cabbages — Production, annual growth rate

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
-2.5 % change on previous year
in 2024
Yugoslav SFR
10.05 % change on previous year
in 1991
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
25th
Yugoslav SFR rank
23rd

Cabbages — Production, annual growth rate over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Yugoslav SFR
02004006008001.0k196219932024

How they compare

Yugoslav SFR currently reports 10.05 % change on previous year against -2.5 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 12.55 % change on previous year.

That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 4.0 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 25th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 23rd of 32 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 3 and Yugoslav SFR in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Yugoslav SFR Difference Ahead
1960s 3.84 % change on previous year 4.33 % change on previous year 0.4833 % change on previous year Yugoslav SFR
1970s 2.47 % change on previous year 2.04 % change on previous year 0.424 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 4.05 % change on previous year -0.5088 % change on previous year 4.56 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 49.9 % change on previous year -0.8586 % change on previous year 50.76 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — production, annual growth rate, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Yugoslav SFR?
Yugoslav SFR, at 10.05 % change on previous year against -2.5 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 1991.
What is the difference in cabbages — production, annual growth rate between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Yugoslav SFR?
12.55 % change on previous year, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Yugoslav SFR?
30 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1991.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for cabbages — production, annual growth rate?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 25th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 23rd of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Yugoslav SFR: Cabbages — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-production-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/yugoslav-sfr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-production-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/yugoslav-sfr/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Yugoslav SFR: Cabbages — Production, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,607 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cabbages — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.