How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Zimbabwe?

14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Singapore vs Zimbabwe: Cabbages: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Singapore

1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0.9759 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Singapore rank

16th

Zimbabwe rank

17th

Cabbages: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

Singapore
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.9759 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0341 1000 USD per square kilometre.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Singapore ranks 16th and Zimbabwe ranks 17th of 110 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Singapore	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0.9717 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.383 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.5886 1000 USD per square kilometre	Singapore
2020s	1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.9493 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0632 1000 USD per square kilometre	Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Singapore or Zimbabwe?: Singapore, at 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.9759 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Singapore and Zimbabwe?: 0.0341 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Zimbabwe?: 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Singapore and Zimbabwe rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Singapore ranks 16th and Zimbabwe ranks 17th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Zimbabwe: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/singapore/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/singapore/zimbabwe/">Singapore vs Zimbabwe: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 111 places, 5,338 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 09 October 2026

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.