New Zealand vs Thailand: Cabbages: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

New Zealand
0.1502 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
0.1455 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
56th
Thailand rank
58th

Cabbages: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • New Zealand
  • Thailand
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.1502 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1455 1000 USD per square kilometre in Thailand, a difference of 0.0047 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 56th and Thailand ranks 58th of 110 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0757 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1191 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0434 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
1970s 0.0767 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1152 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0385 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
1980s 0.0771 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1311 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.054 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
1990s 0.0803 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1494 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0692 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 0.0972 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4105 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3133 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
2010s 0.1373 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2438 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1065 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 0.1652 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1773 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0121 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), New Zealand or Thailand?
New Zealand, at 0.1502 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1455 1000 USD per square kilometre in Thailand as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between New Zealand and Thailand?
0.0047 1000 USD per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Thailand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Thailand rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
New Zealand ranks 56th and Thailand ranks 58th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Thailand: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/thailand/">New Zealand vs Thailand: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
111 places, 5,338 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.