Kuwait vs New Zealand: Cabbages: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Kuwait
0.1691 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.1502 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Kuwait rank
53rd
New Zealand rank
56th

Cabbages: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Kuwait
  • New Zealand
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 0.1691 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1502 1000 USD per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0189 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was New Zealand ahead.

Kuwait ranks 53rd and New Zealand ranks 56th of 110 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0005 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0796 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0791 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0.0356 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0771 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0415 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 0.049 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0803 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0313 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0.3423 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0972 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2451 1000 USD per square kilometre Kuwait
2010s 0.3358 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1373 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1986 1000 USD per square kilometre Kuwait
2020s 0.1632 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1652 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.002 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Kuwait or New Zealand?
Kuwait, at 0.1691 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1502 1000 USD per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Kuwait and New Zealand?
0.0189 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and New Zealand?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Kuwait and New Zealand rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Kuwait ranks 53rd and New Zealand ranks 56th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kuwait vs New Zealand: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/kuwait/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/kuwait/new-zealand/">Kuwait vs New Zealand: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
111 places, 5,338 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.