Jamaica vs Mauritius: Cabbages: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Jamaica
2.63 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
2.32 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
4th
Mauritius rank
6th

Cabbages: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Jamaica
  • Mauritius
0123196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 2.63 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.32 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.31 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Jamaica ranks 4th and Mauritius ranks 6th of 110 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 6 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3729 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.606 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2331 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.5943 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4382 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.156 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 0.8826 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4992 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3834 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 1.27 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9957 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2775 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 1.25 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1129 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 1.91 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7769 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.13 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 2.52 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.35 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Jamaica or Mauritius?
Jamaica, at 2.63 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.32 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Jamaica and Mauritius?
0.31 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Mauritius rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Jamaica ranks 4th and Mauritius ranks 6th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Mauritius: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/mauritius/">Jamaica vs Mauritius: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
111 places, 5,338 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.