Ecuador vs Iceland: Cabbages: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Ecuador
0.0049 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.0025 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
107th
Iceland rank
110th

Cabbages: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Ecuador
  • Iceland
00.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.0049 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0025 1000 USD per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0024 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 2.0 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 107th and Iceland ranks 110th of 110 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Iceland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0332 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0021 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0311 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.018 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.002 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.016 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.0072 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0026 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.0041 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0058 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.0043 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0059 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.0052 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0038 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0014 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.0049 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0036 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Ecuador or Iceland?
Ecuador, at 0.0049 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0025 1000 USD per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Ecuador and Iceland?
0.0024 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Iceland rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Ecuador ranks 107th and Iceland ranks 110th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Iceland: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/iceland/">Ecuador vs Iceland: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
111 places, 5,338 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.