China vs Switzerland: Cabbages: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

China
1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Switzerland
1.23 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
15th
Switzerland rank
13th

Cabbages: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • China
  • Switzerland
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 1.23 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.14 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Switzerland ahead.

China ranks 15th and Switzerland ranks 13th of 110 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Switzerland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.124 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.07 1000 USD per square kilometre Switzerland
1970s 0.1371 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9004 1000 USD per square kilometre Switzerland
1980s 0.1939 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8018 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6079 1000 USD per square kilometre Switzerland
1990s 0.3952 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3273 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0679 1000 USD per square kilometre China
2000s 1 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0047 1000 USD per square kilometre Switzerland
2010s 1 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.346 1000 USD per square kilometre Switzerland
2020s 1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.15 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0534 1000 USD per square kilometre Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), China or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 1.23 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between China and Switzerland?
0.14 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Switzerland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Switzerland rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
China ranks 15th and Switzerland ranks 13th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Switzerland: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/china/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/china/switzerland/">China vs Switzerland: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
111 places, 5,338 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.