Chile vs Guyana: Cabbages: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Chile
0.0704 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Guyana
0.0753 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
72nd
Guyana rank
71st

Cabbages: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Chile
  • Guyana
00.020.040.060.080.1196119922023

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 0.0753 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0704 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0049 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Guyana's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 72nd and Guyana ranks 71st of 110 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Guyana in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Guyana Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0208 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0197 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.0277 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0059 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0218 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.0284 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0079 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0206 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.0648 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0547 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0559 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0077 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0483 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.0468 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0522 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0054 1000 USD per square kilometre Guyana
2020s 0.0675 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0741 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0066 1000 USD per square kilometre Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Chile or Guyana?
Guyana, at 0.0753 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0704 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Chile and Guyana?
0.0049 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Guyana?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Guyana rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Chile ranks 72nd and Guyana ranks 71st of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Guyana: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/guyana/">Chile vs Guyana: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
111 places, 5,338 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.