Chile vs Egypt: Cabbages: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Chile
0.0704 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt
0.0533 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
72nd
Egypt rank
75th

Cabbages: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Chile
  • Egypt
0.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0704 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0533 1000 USD per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 0.0171 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Egypt ahead.

Chile ranks 72nd and Egypt ranks 75th of 110 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Egypt in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Egypt Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0208 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0227 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0019 1000 USD per square kilometre Egypt
1970s 0.0277 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0295 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 USD per square kilometre Egypt
1980s 0.0284 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0371 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0087 1000 USD per square kilometre Egypt
1990s 0.0648 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0439 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0209 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0559 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0563 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 USD per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 0.0468 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0547 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0079 1000 USD per square kilometre Egypt
2020s 0.0675 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0477 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0198 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Chile or Egypt?
Chile, at 0.0704 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0533 1000 USD per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Chile and Egypt?
0.0171 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Egypt?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Egypt rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Chile ranks 72nd and Egypt ranks 75th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Egypt: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/egypt-arab-rep/">Chile vs Egypt: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
111 places, 5,338 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.