Pakistan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Pakistan
0.0427 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
85th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
84th

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Pakistan
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.0439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0427 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Pakistan ranks 85th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 84th of 129 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1268 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1182 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.0134 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0784 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.065 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.0204 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0627 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0423 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0225 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0534 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0184 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Pakistan or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.0439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0427 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Pakistan and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Trinidad and Tobago?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Pakistan ranks 85th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 84th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/trinidad-and-tobago/">Pakistan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
130 places, 6,061 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.