Morocco vs Tunisia: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Morocco
0.0456 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.0456 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco rank
82nd
Tunisia rank
81st

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Morocco
  • Tunisia
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.0456 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0456 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Morocco ranks 82nd and Tunisia ranks 81st of 129 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0071 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0083 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0056 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0.0095 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.0293 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0419 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.0417 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0456 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Morocco or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 0.0456 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0456 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Morocco and Tunisia?
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Morocco and Tunisia rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Morocco ranks 82nd and Tunisia ranks 81st of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs Tunisia: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/morocco/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/morocco/tunisia/">Morocco vs Tunisia: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
130 places, 6,061 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.