Libya vs Suriname: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Libya
0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
125th
Suriname rank
124th

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Libya
  • Suriname
00.0010.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.3 times Libya's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Libya ranks 125th and Suriname ranks 124th of 129 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Libya or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Libya and Suriname?
0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Libya and Suriname rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Libya ranks 125th and Suriname ranks 124th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Suriname: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/libya/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/libya/suriname/">Libya vs Suriname: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
130 places, 6,061 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.