Kuwait vs New Zealand: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Kuwait
0.0727 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.0504 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kuwait rank
76th
New Zealand rank
79th

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Kuwait
  • New Zealand
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 0.0727 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0504 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0223 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.4 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was New Zealand ahead.

Kuwait ranks 76th and New Zealand ranks 79th of 129 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0267 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0.0153 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0259 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 0.0211 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0269 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0.1471 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0326 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1145 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Kuwait
2010s 0.1443 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0461 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0983 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Kuwait
2020s 0.0701 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0554 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0147 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Kuwait

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Kuwait or New Zealand?
Kuwait, at 0.0727 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0504 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Kuwait and New Zealand?
0.0223 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and New Zealand?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Kuwait and New Zealand rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Kuwait ranks 76th and New Zealand ranks 79th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kuwait vs New Zealand: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/kuwait/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/kuwait/new-zealand/">Kuwait vs New Zealand: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
130 places, 6,061 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.