Jamaica vs Japan: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Jamaica
0.9861 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
0.895 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
7th
Japan rank
9th

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Jamaica
  • Japan
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 0.9861 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.895 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Japan, a difference of 0.0911 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.

Jamaica ranks 7th and Japan ranks 9th of 129 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Japan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1397 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1970s 0.2227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1980s 0.3307 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
1990s 0.4771 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
2000s 0.4703 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.988 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
2010s 0.7145 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2947 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Japan
2020s 0.9462 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9069 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0393 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Jamaica or Japan?
Jamaica, at 0.9861 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.895 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Japan as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Jamaica and Japan?
0.0911 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Japan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Japan rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Jamaica ranks 7th and Japan ranks 9th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Japan: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/japan/">Jamaica vs Japan: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
130 places, 6,061 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.