Iraq vs Uruguay: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Iraq
0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iraq rank
115th
Uruguay rank
112th

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Iraq
  • Uruguay
00.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iraq, a difference of 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.3 times Iraq's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Iraq ranks 115th and Uruguay ranks 112th of 129 countries.

Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
1970s 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
1980s 0.0046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
1990s 0.0101 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
2000s 0.0088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
2010s 0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
2020s 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Iraq or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iraq as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Iraq and Uruguay?
0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iraq and Uruguay rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Iraq ranks 115th and Uruguay ranks 112th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Uruguay: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iraq/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iraq/uruguay/">Iraq vs Uruguay: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
130 places, 6,061 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.