Egypt vs Guatemala: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Egypt
0.1287 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
0.1316 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
57th
Guatemala rank
55th

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Egypt
  • Guatemala
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.1316 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1287 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 57th and Guatemala ranks 55th of 129 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 5 and Guatemala in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0548 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0245 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0302 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
1970s 0.0712 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0365 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
1980s 0.0895 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0711 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0184 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
1990s 0.1059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0719 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
2000s 0.1359 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 0.1321 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 0.1152 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1583 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0431 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Egypt or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0.1316 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1287 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Egypt and Guatemala?
0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Guatemala rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Egypt ranks 57th and Guatemala ranks 55th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Guatemala: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/guatemala/">Egypt vs Guatemala: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
130 places, 6,061 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.