Costa Rica vs Hungary: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Costa Rica
0.109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary
0.1225 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Costa Rica rank
63rd
Hungary rank
60th

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Hungary
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0.1225 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0135 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 63rd and Hungary ranks 60th of 129 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Hungary Difference Ahead
1960s 0.022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.542 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1970s 0.0314 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5307 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4993 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 0.0389 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4225 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3836 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 0.0443 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3788 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3345 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 0.0837 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3548 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2711 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 0.1383 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.168 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0297 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Costa Rica or Hungary?
Hungary, at 0.1225 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2017.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Costa Rica and Hungary?
0.0135 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Hungary?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Costa Rica and Hungary rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Costa Rica ranks 63rd and Hungary ranks 60th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Hungary: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/hungary/">Costa Rica vs Hungary: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
130 places, 6,061 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.