Costa Rica vs Cuba: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Costa Rica
0.109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba
0.1119 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
63rd
Cuba rank
62nd

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Cuba
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.1119 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 63rd and Cuba ranks 62nd of 129 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Cuba Difference Ahead
1960s 0.022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0275 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.0314 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0401 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0.0389 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0943 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0553 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.0443 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1788 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.0837 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3882 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.1321 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2655 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1334 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1138 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Costa Rica or Cuba?
Cuba, at 0.1119 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Costa Rica and Cuba?
0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Cuba?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Cuba rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Costa Rica ranks 63rd and Cuba ranks 62nd of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Cuba: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/cuba/">Costa Rica vs Cuba: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
130 places, 6,061 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.