China vs Jamaica: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

China
0.8885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
0.9861 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
10th
Jamaica rank
7th

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • China
  • Jamaica
00.250.50.751196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 0.9861 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.8885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.0976 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.

China ranks 10th and Jamaica ranks 7th of 129 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Jamaica in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1397 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0386 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 0.1134 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1093 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 0.1613 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3307 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1694 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 0.3277 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4771 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1494 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 0.8179 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4703 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3476 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2010s 0.8168 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7145 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2020s 0.8901 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9462 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.056 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), China or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at 0.9861 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.8885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between China and Jamaica?
0.0976 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Jamaica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Jamaica rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
China ranks 10th and Jamaica ranks 7th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Jamaica: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/jamaica/">China vs Jamaica: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
130 places, 6,061 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.