Chile vs Norway: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Chile
0.0215 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.0194 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
94th
Norway rank
96th

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Chile
  • Norway
00.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0215 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0194 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.0021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Chile ranks 94th and Norway ranks 96th of 129 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0064 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0321 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.0085 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0269 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0184 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.0087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0201 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0.0198 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0285 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0086 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.0171 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0119 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0.0143 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0226 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0083 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0.0206 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0214 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Chile or Norway?
Chile, at 0.0215 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0194 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Chile and Norway?
0.0021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Norway rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Chile ranks 94th and Norway ranks 96th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Norway: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/norway/">Chile vs Norway: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
130 places, 6,061 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.