Canada vs Peru: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Canada
0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
0.0058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
114th
Peru rank
111th

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Canada
  • Peru
0.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0.0058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.4 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.

Canada ranks 114th and Peru ranks 111th of 129 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru
1970s 0.0025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru
1980s 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0082 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru
1990s 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru
2000s 0.0044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0065 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru
2010s 0.0044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru
2020s 0.0045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0056 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Canada or Peru?
Peru, at 0.0058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Canada and Peru?
0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Peru rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Canada ranks 114th and Peru ranks 111th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Peru: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/canada/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/canada/peru/">Canada vs Peru: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
130 places, 6,061 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.