Barbados vs Jordan: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Barbados
0.1674 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan
0.1437 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
48th
Jordan rank
51st

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Barbados
  • Jordan
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.1674 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1437 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 0.0237 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 48th and Jordan ranks 51st of 129 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1589 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0252 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1337 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 0.3672 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0138 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3534 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 0.5858 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0326 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5533 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 0.4656 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0454 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4202 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 0.2681 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0634 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.1749 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0905 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0844 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.161 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0211 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Barbados or Jordan?
Barbados, at 0.1674 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1437 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Barbados and Jordan?
0.0237 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Jordan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Jordan rank globally for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Barbados ranks 48th and Jordan ranks 51st of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Jordan: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/barbados/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cabbages-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/barbados/jordan/">Barbados vs Jordan: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
130 places, 6,061 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.